Posts Tagged ‘2008’

The abbey roundup continued

Following the Juhfark in Saturday’s post, I’ve become curious about other  Somlói Apátsági wines and I didn’t hesitate to open a young Furmint.

Somlói Apátsági Pince – Furmint, 2008

Shiny deep golden yellow with a vibrant brownish tone.

Very intense nose of higly concentrated minerals and honey with a botrytis accent. A nice weight on the palate. Savory and minerally first, a bit dull and tart from the midpalate. Tea notes emerge over a deep and concentrated layer of minerals, preceding traces of oak.

Somlói Apátsági Pince have built a cult following over the years. Their wines showing an even heavier character and rocky edge in the last two years I really wonder if they can break into the mainstream but I have doubts. I’m looking forward to see where they’re heading next.

It’s time for me to catch up with my other Somló favorite Spiegelberg.

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: February 16th, 2011
Categories: Somlói apátsági, Wine reviews
Tags: , , ,
Comments: 9 Comments.

Doppio, Nectar Sexardique

As I’m always happy to meet a new winery I can’t be too negative this time, could I? Plus, Merfelsz seem to be lovable folk: small estate (12ha), charmingly useless website, family tradition, Szekszárd roots, what’s not to liket? Nectar Sexardique is the flagship cuvée of the winery I suppose (for there is a whole empty page dedicated to it in the main menu of the winery’s website) and if you couldn’t make a decent wine in 2008 in Szekszárd then perhaps you’re in the wrong industry. Let’s see if they are.

Merfelsz – Doppio, Nectar Sexardique, 2008

According to the label on the bottle (there’s more useful information on it than anywhere else on the web combined about the wine) this is a kind of late harvest wine, which explains the alcohol (14.5%, might be too much for you, but not for me). This wine has seen 14 months in oak, unfiltered. So far it sounds like this wine mas made for me.

The nose is fresh and fruity with wild berries. Similar palate with mulberry and black-currant and tasty sour cherry bitterness. There’s no finesse here or elegance especially as long as the tannin’s concerned, at least partly due to some harsh acidity at the finish. After decanting and leaving it for a while it’ll be more evolved structurally as well as taste-wise, developing fine dark chocolate aromas.

Still much to learn, Merfelsz, and perhaps it would be wise to reconsider the pricing as well.

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: February 1st, 2011
Categories: Merfelsz
Tags: , , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

Györgykovács – Olaszrizling, 2008

Lemon yellow with greenish reflections. Nettle on the nose. On the palate notes of celery and lovage mingled with light chalky minerality. Very short length. The acidity tastes flat and dull.

I’m a bit disappointed.

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: January 13th, 2011
Categories: Györgykovács
Tags: , , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

Champagne Supernova

I don’t pretend I understand Champagne or sparkling wines in general. But I had a quiet new years eve followed by an even more quiet weekend and I decided to share with you my impressions about some Champagne and Hungarian sparkling wines made á la méthode traditionnelle I spent time with during this period. Here they are, in chronologic order.

Hungaria – Extra Dry

This is the top wine of the Hungaria line of Törley group. With no vintage on the label, I can only guess that this is a mix of various vintages and varietals but I couldn’t find any more information about this wine on the winery’s website. Such a shame, although 99.999% of the consumers of this wine wouldn’t be interested anyway. This is a sparkling wine that only sells during the last week of the year, deservedly if you ask me, as it’s only slightly better than the regular Törley line under HUF1000. Pale lemon yellow, bright and charming with citrus notes on the nose. On the palate still a bit flimsy but I didn’t mind having a glass of this one, knowing what was about to come.

Kreinbacher – Syrah Rosé, 2008

Strange as it may be, probably the only Syrah of the Somló wine region went into this sparkling wine. Two years ago we celebrated the new year with the Syrah 2007. It was lovely, so we started 2010 the same way and this had become the wine I most often bought in 2010 when I was looking for a sparkling wine. The 2008 summarises well why.

It’s beautiful, brassy with faded salmon reflections, vibrant and releases charming towers of bubbles like a smoking chimney. Light nose, fairly yeasty and a bit spicy but mostly fruity, although a bit restrained. It’s delicious too: lightly rocky with hints of red fruits. Dry, fresh but not too acidic and has a decent legth.

Szentesi – Pinot Noir Rosé, 2008

Champagne/sparkling wine is supposed to be cheerful and festive. Rosé wines suite these occasions perfectly and I prefer these to white sparkling wines. Just like the Kreinbacher, this sparkling wine is one of its kind, I don’t think many producers venture in the field of Pinot Noir in the Velence region and most of  this little ended up in this sparkling wine. This was our first encounter and it was an immediate success.

Very similar to the Kreinbacher in appearance, perhaps a touch more pinkish, just lovely, festive indeed and very gay. A bit more yeasty and more fruity with raspberry primarily. Very dry, very light with subtle acidity. Light and crisp character. According to my wife, who’s the real authority as long as sparkling wines are concerned, Kreinbacher Syrah is slightly better than this one. I’m not so sure, but again, I really don’t get sparkling wines the way she does.

There are three more Champagnes to come, but let’s save them for tomorrow as I have some unfinished business with a very good Szamorodni right now.

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: January 2nd, 2011
Categories: Wine reviews
Tags: , , , , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

St. Andrea beyond blessing (Hangács Bikavér 2008)

Hangács Bikavér 2008 is almost identical to Áldás 2008 (aka El fin de la inocencia) except that it’s not. And not just that Syrah didn’t make it to the blend at Hangács (and it’s not the less oak either). It looks like only Pinot Noir did. Hangács Pinot Noir 2006 wasn’t a huge wine itself but I wonder if Hangács Pinot Noir 2008 is any different from the Bikavér Blend made in 2008.

St. Andrea – Hangács Bikavér, 2008

Medium ruby, clear and lively. Spicy bouquet with hints of anise, clove and Açaí berry, very Pinot Noir-esque. Fresh but warm style on the palate with very smooth tannins and a sour cherry core bitterness. Loose in terms of structure, thinner than Áldás first, as far as I can judge, but feels bit more weighty after some exposure to air. The acidity remains a bit scratchy on the midpalate for hours but the palate will be packed full of fine dark chocolate.

Should be decanted long before drinking. Not so expressive at present, this Bikavér may still age better than Áldás 2008.

One more remark: this wine shouldn’t have passed the Bikavér examination. Because it’s not one.

Price: HUF 3 750

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: December 6th, 2010
Categories: St. Andrea
Tags: , , , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

What do Tiffán, Hilltop, Tűzkő and Chateau Kajmád have in common?

A stock clearance of a well known retailer provided my with a good opportunity to acquire some bottles for party people coming to visit us from time to time, you know smokers and alike. Some of these wines were so disappointing they drove me to the conclusion I made about mediocre wine reviews in this post. Tiffány’s Portugieser 2009, Tiffán’s Imortal cuvée 2007 and Tűzkő’s Sauvignon Blanc 2008 were good match with cigarettes only really. The following two wines were the best of the lot, so far.

The wines

Chateau Kajmád – Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Kékfrankos, 2003

Considering it was made in 2003 we can call this an early bird of it’s kind with it’s 14% alcohol.

The look: A dark core surrounded by pigeon blood hue and a pale brownish rim, with some purplish reflections.

Nose: Interesting spices coming through a stuffy bouquet at first, things like turmeric-favored plum and other oddities.

Palate: Dirty. After 90 minutes it evoles structurally but I’d like more definition to it. The wine’s texture is oily and I’m suspecting a good deal of glycerin here. The tart fruityness I would even call pleasant would it not been ruined by the whole picture including quite a lot of half powdery, half sticky overflowing tannins soaked up by the glycerin. The wine has a dirty character which I associate with many – even not so old – Ch. Kajmád wines, very much the opposite of the clean Konyári or Gróf Buttler wines.

Hilltop – Prémium Merlot 2008

Look: dead ruby.

Nose: mulberry syrup, very fruity.

Palate: Ligh-bodied wine with blueberry wrapped in burnt rubber and licorice aromas. Soft texture and polished tannins. But as a whole it’s too “made” and simple.

Evaluation: forget about it.

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

Konyári – Cabernet Syrah, 2008

Konyári is arguably (source: konyari.hu) the best known and most acclaimed winery of South-Balaton. This statement alone is sufficient to dislike the winery. This is so crucial to Konyári however that the statement reappears on five consequtive pages under the menu “about us” of the winery’s website, and apparently that’s all we need to know about “them” (plus that they have 30 hectares and they produce 200K bottles a year). I also learned that sustainable development means planting trees, not use too much pesticides and not to use air-conditioner in the cellar. It all makes sense to me without any ideology. Other interesting facts can also be learned from the website, now I know for instance that the most exigent consumers are buying their wines in restaurants.

About the wine

Appearances. First of all the bottle is handsome and well made. And so is the wine. Bright, lively claret with many reflections.

Smell. Restrained but very clean nose with hints of fruits.

Palate. Well composed palate with a firm acidic backbone and a distinct polished but hard tannic underpinning which I start to recognise as a Konyári trademark, also found in Ikon’s best wines. Lovely texture as a result of the well integrated and well balanced acidity and smart use of oak. Very gentle acidity indeed. There are no intense aromas in this wine but it displays some fruityness of red currant and cherry. Elegantly styled light and clean character with a pleasant finish. The 14% alcohol is nowhere to be seen.

Price: HUF 2500

Conclusion: Well made wine representing good value for the money.

Hint: I recommend you decant it or simply leave it exposed to air for 60-90 minutes before you drink it. I also liked it most at around 17 centigrades maximum.

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: September 21st, 2010
Categories: Konyári
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

Kikelet – Furmint, 2008

Pale lemon color with greenish reflections. Pleasant fruity-floral nose with acacia dominance. Very citric palate with overflowing lemon scented acidity which doesn’t allow any of the wine’s merits come through and even turns a bit appalingly bitter at the end.

It’s so disappointing after the 2006 which was a great Furmint.

Score: 3+/4-

Price: HUF 2440



http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: June 22nd, 2010
Categories: Kikelet
Tags: , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

Laposa – Badacsonyi Rizling, 2008

Rizling in Hungary can be either Riesling, Olaszrizling, both or none. Laposa’s Badacsonyi Rizling is Olasz Rizling which I can only assume (but not to be absolutely sure) means Olaszrizling.

Pale golden yellow. The bouquet is lovely and rich. Minerally notes mingled with lime, lemon balm and other greenish notes, especially a lovage accent here. Fairly exciting, fresh, not too heavy, interesting. Similarly expressive palate which kicks off with brilliant, sharp acidity with lime juice aromas mingled with a drop of sweetness and a hint of boiled persley. Well balanced long finish with flavours of lemon balm and lime. The palate gets more and more salty.

Relatively coherent wine considering its complexity at it’s price.

Score: 5, 5+ points

Price: HUF 1760

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: May 24th, 2010
Categories: Laposa
Tags: , , , ,
Comments: No Comments.

From Kutyahegy to rabbit hole

Orsolya is the most charming of all overpriced cellars of Eger. Their 2005 Kutyahegyi Zweigelt is a classic wine, from a certain aspect. It (and some similarily well made wines) brought them fame (in certain circles), and although the childish wine labels remain, the innocence was soon lost.

I wrote about abused grapes recently and how Zweigelt was the most prominent. For many the breakthrough came from another producer from Villány but for me, Orsolya’s Zweigelt 2005 was it: dense, fruity but fresh, very much unlike the zweigelts we used to know. I expected a lot from Orsolya Pincészet but the next breakthrough hasn’t come yet, they couldn’t take their winemaking to the next level. The wines are mostly fine, never poor really, but always very pricy.

The Zweigelt 2008 is a violet wine with a wide pink rim. The bouquet is fresh and dense, full of plum jam and notes of blueberry, clove and hints of cinnamon. Fairly fruity on the palate too but it’s composed of less ripe material. Very fresh character with vibrant acidity and unripe tannin underneath it all. The wine’s still too young, hence the unripe walnut, red currant and later sour cherry elements. These are wrapped in a thin film of dark chocolate. Later acaí (the tropical fruit), lot of it.

Score: 5+

Price: HUF 3 800

http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png
Posted: April 3rd, 2010
Categories: Orsolya
Tags: , ,
Comments: No Comments.