<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Budapest Daily Review &#187; Szőke Mátyás</title>
	<atom:link href="http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/category/reviews-by-region/matraalja-reviews-by-region/szoke-matyas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide</link>
	<description>Wine Guide to Hungary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:15:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nyakas, Szeremley, Laposa and more</title>
		<link>http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/2009/reviews-by-score/5-points/nyakas-szeremley-laposa-szoke-and-a-pleasant-surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/2009/reviews-by-score/5-points/nyakas-szeremley-laposa-szoke-and-a-pleasant-surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4 points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Badacsony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etyek-Buda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Festivals & events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mátraalja]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nyakas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Szatmári]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Szeremley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Szőke Mátyás]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wine reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as promised I&#8217;m publishing the rest of my notes from Vinagora Borgála now, I couldn&#8217;t do it earlier. These are just impressions rather than proper tasting notes anyway, but here they are: as I said, the white wines in general were a bit disappointing this year, but not all of them.
Nyakas Pinot Griggio 2008, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as promised I&#8217;m publishing the rest of my notes from Vinagora Borgála now, I couldn&#8217;t do it earlier. These are just impressions rather than proper tasting notes anyway, but here they are: as I said, the white wines in general were a bit disappointing this year, but not all of them.</p>
<p><strong>Nyakas Pinot Griggio 2008</strong>, for example, was surprisingly good with a fresh, sweet apple, ripe lemon and grapefruit aromas on the nose and on the palate. Scored at around <strong>5-/5 points</strong>. Well balanced, medium acidic wine. I was looking forward to <strong>Szeremley Kéknyelű 2005</strong> after our <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><a href="http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/reviews-by-score/5-points/keknyelu-vertical-part-2/">recent vertical tasting</a></em></span> of previous vintages but it couldn&#8217;t improve the average rating. Although it has an interesting, even exciting Kéknyelű character on the nose (not very intense though) with greenish notes, it has a too acidic and too empty palate, firm, with a citrus element but it&#8217;s still one of the most overrated white wines of Hungary, it&#8217;s unique selling point is the rarity (perhaps for a reason?). <strong>Szőke Mátyás Mátrai Szürkebarát 2007</strong> is more attractive with papaya and green walnut bouquet and more subtle acidity on the palate, scoring <strong>5- points</strong> now. I expected more from<strong> Laposa</strong>&#8217;s<strong> Bazaltbor</strong>&#8217;s <strong>Badacsonyi Riesling</strong> <strong>2002</strong> but it was only good. With a citrus, passion-fruit and breadcrumb nose &#8211; I expected more minerality. On the palate oaky-vanilla mingle with hints of minerality. <strong>5-, 5 </strong>points here. I was positively surprised by <strong>Szatmári Szigligeti Zeusz Válogatás 2006</strong>, starting with a medium-dark corn hue with nice greenish reflections. Comes with a heavy character of tea and wet hay aromas on the nose, later matte, lavage and a hint of minerality too. The palate is tea mingled with lot of salty-minerality, full and fairly weighty. Burnt almond, praline and caramel, burnt walnut notes with a salty touch. Scores <strong>5+ points</strong>. <strong>Karádi-Berger Tokaji Furmint 2007</strong> has the most suspicious industrial apple-juice nose ever (from a very specific company in the south of Balaton), with some litchi and a sour-sweet accent. The palate is the same apple-juice. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://budapestdailyreview.com/wineguide/2009/reviews-by-score/5-points/nyakas-szeremley-laposa-szoke-and-a-pleasant-surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
